I want to look at the Nasdaq 100 Index from this perspective in the day chart below, going back to 2012, evaluating the duration and extent of all market swings to date. This can give us perspective on how we should be betting and position sizing as it relates to position/portfolio risk -- as directional traders -- and how we can develop a systematic sense of market expectation. You can reference the numbers 1-5 which identify intermediate market turning points from 2012 to present, as long swings in the Nasdaq 100 index.
Evaluating Extent and Duration as follows:
1-2:
44 days, 343 Pts (H-L Swing)
2-3:
78 days, 438 Pts (L-H Swing)
3-4:
41 days, 379 Pts (H-L Swing)
4-5(?):
80 days, 316 Pts (L-H Swing)
1-3 (H-H):
121 days
3-5(?) (H-H):
120 days
Downswings Symmetry (H-L) 1-2, 3-4 = 41/44 days, 343/379 Pts
121 days
3-5(?) (H-H):
120 days
Downswings Symmetry (H-L) 1-2, 3-4 = 41/44 days, 343/379 Pts
Upswing Symmetry (L-H) 2-3, 4-5(?) = 78/80 days, 316/438 Pts.
Intermediate (H-H) Symmetry 1-3, 3-5(?) = 121/120 days
Intermediate (H-H) Symmetry 1-3, 3-5(?) = 121/120 days
Firstly, we can observe how the space-time relation has been a consistent factor in market swings going back a year. And we can observe how the current rally (4-5) is measuring in duration (vs 2-3 Upswing), but short in extent (316 pts (4-5) vs 438pts (2-3)) -- not perfectly symmetrical. But as Gann would say, time governs all price movement. So taking Gann's wisdom, is time up in 4-5? 1-3 H-H, 3-5 H-H = 121/120 days is also measuring. Using time (and Gann's insights) we can become better risk-managers with our trading capital and improve our anticipation of market turning points.